The Context Spiral: Breaking A Conversational Curse

March 08, 2025

"Get to the point already!" If you've had a conversation with me in the last decade, you've probably thought this but were too polite to say it.1

There I was, twenty minutes into explaining what should have been a two-minute anecdote about an old classmate, when I noticed my friend's eyes had glazed over. Not the polite "I'm-still-listening" glaze, but the full "I've-started-mentally-planning-my-next-vacation-to-Tahiti" thousand-yard stare.

It was then I realized I'd spent 18 minutes providing elaborate backstory and precisely 2 minutes telling the actual story.

The Cross-Cultural Spiral

This isn't just me being long-winded. It's the result of a fascinating cross-cultural quirk. When Western designers study visual perception, they find people raised in Western cultures tend to scan information in a Z pattern. Your eyes move across, down, across again. You're looking for information in a linear sequence.

But in many Eastern cultures, eye-tracking studies show something different: a spiral pattern. People take in the entirety of a scene first, then circle inward toward what they're seeking. Context before content.

This manifests in a famous psychology experiment: subjects are shown a crowd of people where everyone is sad except one smiling person in the middle. When asked, "Is this person happy?", Western subjects typically answer "Yes, he's smiling." Eastern subjects often answer "No, he's sad" – because the context (everyone around him is sad) outweighs the individual expression.2

My Multi-Cultural Curse

Having spent my developmental years3 split between the United States and East Asia, I unconsciously absorbed both patterns. But there's another cultural quirk that compounds the problem.

People from the Intermountain West (that corridor from Southern Idaho through Nevada to Northern Arizona sometimes affectionally referred to as "The Morridor") have this "charming" habit: when you meet someone new, they'll tell you their entire life story. They might compress it, but you're getting the complete biography whether you asked for it or not.

Between these two formative influences, I'm a context machine. By default I am unable to tell you about meeting an old friend without first establishing:

  • Who they are,
  • What year they were born,
  • How we met,
  • Their family structure,
  • What they studied,
  • Where they lived,
  • What languages they speak, and
  • The geopolitical situation during our friendship

And that's the abbreviated version!4

The Moment I Realized I Had a Problem

Yesterday, I caught myself twenty minutes into providing "necessary context" for a five-second punchline about someone I hadn't seen in 15 years. My poor conversational hostage was too polite to interrupt, but their eyes had long since departed for greener pastures.

Ridiculously, I was aware I was doing it. I even had an internal monologue running: "Lorenzo, just get to the point. They don't need to know about this person's third cousin's career change."

And yet, I couldn't stop. It was as if my brain refused to deliver information without ensuring the listener had the complete contextual operating system required to properly process it.

Breaking the Spiral

My greatest communication challenge isn't vocabulary, public speaking anxiety, or even my tendency to use obscure references. It's my inability to deliver the Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF).

What I need is to flip my natural instinct and adopt a Western military-style briefing format:

  • Bottom Line Up Front: Start with the punch-line! Don't bury the lede!
  • Introduction: Set the stage. "Let me tell you about..."
  • Background: Give a brief context or history to get us to the start of the story. "Back in the day..."
  • Analysis: "Here's what happened and why it matters..."
  • Context: "This is why..." Link the story to the bigger picture.
  • Outlook: "And so, in the end..." Wrap it all up with a final emphasis.

This is my new frontier. For the next few months, I'm challenging myself to deliver the headline before the story.

A Request

If you're reading this and we interact in person, I'm giving you permission – no, I'm asking you – to call me out when I start the contextual death spiral. When you see me taking the scenic route to a simple story, just say "spiral" or make a spiral gesture with your finger. (No Goatse gestures, please.)

I'll take a deep breath, close my eyes for a moment, and try to remember what my actual point was before I took you on an unnecessary tour of someone's entire ancestral history.

Your eardrums will thank you, and I might finally finish telling a story while you're still awake to hear the punchline.


  1. Unless you've lived with me or gone on vacation with me, in which case you've definitely said it. Repeatedly. With increasing exasperation.
  2. I'm simplifying a complex body of research here, but the general finding across multiple cross-cultural studies is consistent: Western perception tends to focus on salient objects independent of context, while Eastern perception emphasizes contextual relationships. This specific experiment comes from Masuda, T., Ellsworth, P. C., Mesquita, B., Leu, J., Tanida, S., & Van de Veerdonk, E. (2008). "Placing the Face in Context: Cultural Differences in the Perception of Facial Emotion." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 365-381. In their study, participants viewed cartoons depicting a central person expressing one emotion surrounded by others expressing either the same or different emotions. Japanese participants' judgments of the central person's emotion were influenced by the surrounding people, while Western participants focused primarily on the central figure. The other point I made comes from eye-tracking research from Chua, H. F., et. al., (2005). "Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(35), 12629-12633, which found that Americans fixated more on focal objects while Chinese participants made more saccades to the background. Neither approach is better – they're just different ways our brains develop based on cultural environments.
  3. By "developmental years," I'm referring to that critical period before your prefrontal cortex has finished fully developing - which, at least in my book, is responsible for much of our cognitive processing, decision-making, and social behavior. Neuroscience shows this development isn't complete until our mid-20s, meaning our brains are particularly susceptible to environmental influences during childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood.
  4. This is especially problematic when I'm excited about something. My enthusiasm for providing "complete understanding" grows exponentially with my interest in the subject. So the topics I care about most are precisely the ones I struggle to communicate efficiently.